Tamara Stefanovich (piano), Mark Padmore (tenor), Thomas Larcher (piano)
© Harmonia Mundi 2014
WORKS
- Smart Dust (2005)
I. Very slow
II. Very fast
- Poems (1975–2000)
I. Sad yellow whale
II. Cantabile
III. Babu Chiri’s house
IV. Waking up in Najing
V. (The day) When I lost my funny green dog
VI. A little piece for Ursu
VII. Frida falls asleep
VIII. MUI 1
IX. One, two, three, four, nine
X. Twelve years old
XI. Don’t step on the Regenwurm!
XII. A song from?
- What Becomes (2009)
Wertfrei
Parabolic Bike
Slow
Scherzo
Fission
Isaac
Flowing
- A Padmore Cycle (2010–2011)
I. Ich schreibe heute durch
II. Almauftrieb
III. Hart am Herz
IV. Familie Numero drei
V. Hunger nach Heimat, die keine mehr ist
VI. Los los
VII. Ferdl
VIII. Und beim Weggehen schmilzt aus den Augen der Schnee
IX. Lange zögern die Steine
X. Dein Wort mein Blindenhund
XI. Der Körper des Vogels am Weg

Thomas Larcher’s sound world is both original and captivating in its fusion of contemplative harmonies with innovative performance techniques. Written for and performed by tenor Mark Padmore, «A Padmore Cycle» features the composer at the keyboard. Works for solo piano performed by Tamara Stefanovich round out this programme of first recordings.
Background
What Becomes
As a composer, I had wanted for a long time to get away from the piano’s natural sound. This was in part due to the fact that I’d had this sound in my ears every day since my earliest childhood with all the intensity that marks a musician’s relationship to his instrument. Over time, I associated this sound more and more directly with a sense of something worn out, obsolete, at a dead-end. The instrument, for me, was dead, relegated to a position outside the stream of music’s development. Rachmaninov’s Third and Bartók’s Second Piano Concertos represent for me the last authentic high points in which statement, form, and virtuosity are still coherent, in which traditional pianistic methods are still used to say something truly new.
The possibilities electronic music offers and the invention of the synthesizer assumed the role previously played by other instruments in the search for new sounds and in catalyzing new developments. And the piano became a sacrosanct historical instrument still built today exactly as it had been at the end of the 19th century. I wanted to interrupt this trend and elicit from the piano new sounds and means of expression that would turn it into a «different instrument», able once again to speak for our time. That is why all the works I composed then that include the piano require a prepared instrument and are played directly on the strings.
«Smart Dust» concludes this long development. For this piece, the piano must be completely prepared with rubber wedges and gaffer tape. It was my attempt to return to the piano a sound with a sense of urgency, of desperation, a sound that evokes one’s sense of inner imprisonment, of suffocation from which there is no release, something that cannot be easily expressed but only forced out, something to hammer against the piano’s sound and the entire range of conventions bound to it. The image I had in mind while composing was inspired by an article on the internet that said, «Picture being able to scatter hundreds of tiny sensors around a building to monitor temperature or humidity. Or deploying, like pixie dust, a network of minuscule, remote sensor chips to track enemy movements in a military operation. Smart dust devices are tiny wireless microelectromechanical sensors that can detect everything from light to vibrations …» The term smart dust is very well suited to the atmosphere of this piece which has something wild, threatening, as well as hermetic to it.
The «Poems» were, in a certain sense, a surprising gift for me. I had reached an endpoint with Smart Dust and continuing in this direction was not possible. After some time, I was able to go back to the piano and rediscover its natural sound. I had also begun to experiment with very short forms. I wanted to make music in a minimal space that would not cross certain technical limits. This had to be music that was purified, reduced, clear, and therefore all the more intense. And I returned to a very clear tonality.
The twelve «Poems» teem with associations and are rife with connections to other works. Whenever I write for the piano, I am automatically immersed in all the piano music I know and have played myself. In part, the «Poems» refer directly to other composers, for example to Bartók («MUI 1»), but also to a piece that I composed when I was twelve years old («Twelve years old»). Yet they also consist in part, of elements taken from what I call my «notebox». The enigmatic titles that hearken back to personal experiences, images, and memories also reflect this source. Parts of longer compositions, of «Madhares», for example, or «My Illness Is the Medicine I Need», can also be heard—reduced and made even quieter through the piano.
Leif Ove Andsnes, who had initially inspired me to write «What Becomes», set conditions for me in composing it. His requirement was that the piece must fit into a recital program that pianists would consider «normal» (although, in truth, such «piano recitals» are anything but «normal»; most are little more than geriatric museum tours by candlelight). The instrument, therefore, could not be prepared; perhaps this would also keep it (and the audience) from going out of tune.
I very consciously kept the history of the piano in mind while composing. Lennie Tristano and his piece Line Up, with tracks recorded an octave lower and at half the speed, then reproduced for the final recording at twice the speed, thus an octave higher, were an enormous influence on my composition Parabolic Bike. Before, no piano had ever sounded the way it does in Line Up in terms of speed, phrasing, and dynamics, and therefore naturally in the urgency of its expression. With this piece, Tristano introduced to the world a new idea of how music could sound, a «utopia of music». George Crumb, who created marvellous sounds on the piano using glissandi on the strings in his Apparition, was very important for the last movement, Flowing. The scherzo of What Becomes is a reference to Rachmaninov and his particular variant of extremely virtuosic playing. In addition, the constantly repeated interludes allude to Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition.
In the «Padmore Cycle», I use texts by two writers and friends, Hans Aschenwald and Alois Hotschnig. These are short poems about the natural environment, the mountains and the landscape of my native region which is very important to me—an ideal textual foundation for me in composing this very open, tonal, fragile, and transparent music which always follows the texts’ verbal melody, rhythm, and tonality. There is no experimentation with words or syllables. These texts, almost all truncated and enigmatic, need very little time and space, whereas the piano reflects retrospectively for a long time on the words that have been sung.
In Mark Padmore I found a companion willing to accompany me into remote musical territory, someone with the courage and openness to hold back his voice at many stages so that it would sound brittle and fragile as well as very exposed, yet all the while his voice remained extremely precise and present. Only that enabled me to draw a musical arc through the disparate texts.
– THOMAS LARCHER, CD-Booklet; Translation: Tess Lewis
reviews
Meret Forster: Leporello, BR-Klassik Radio, April 2014
Vertraut ist ihm das Klavier von Kindheit an. Und mit seinen «Poems» – zwölf tonal verankerten Miniaturen – kreist, umzingelt, ja liebkost Thomas Larcher sein Instrument von verschiedenen Seiten. Doch um Eigenes auf diesem scheinbar vertrauten Terrain zu komponieren, musste ihm das Klavier erst einmal fremd werden. Dem natürlichen Klavierklang wollte er als Komponist entfliehen, schreibt er im Booklet. Für ihn war das Instrument tot. Aus der Musikentwicklung herausgefallen. Doch er hat es wieder gefunden, etwa vollständig präpariert mit Gummikeilen und Tape in den beiden Stücken «Smart Dust» aus dem Jahr 2005.
Ob präparierter Klang oder konventionelles Tastenspiel: durchweg vermitteln diese Klavierstücke eine intensive und persönliche Beziehung zum Ausdrucksspektrum des Instruments. Schließlich absolvierte Larcher – 1963 in Innsbruck geboren – auch ein Klavierstudium und erspielte sich zunächst als Pianist international einen Namen.
Die neue CD präsentiert neben seinen drei Solowerken «Smart Dust», «What becomes» und «Poems» auch den 20-minütigen Liederzyklus «A Padmore Cycle» für Tenor und Klavier, komponiert in den Jahren 2010/11 zu Gedichten der österreichischen Autoren Hans Aschenwald und Alois Hotschnig. Es sind kurze, feine und immer wieder auch humorvolle Lieder auf Texte, die skizzenhaft Natur und Berglandschaften assoziieren, wie Postkarten mit wenigen Worten, aber desto treffenderen Bildern. Widmungsträger Mark Padmore sind sie auf die Stimme komponiert.
So sensibel und individuell Thomas Larchers Musik komponiert ist, so kongenial wird sie hier interpretiert: Den Liederzyklus begleitet Larcher selbst. Und gemeinsam mit Mark Padmore spürt er dem spezifischen Charakter der einzelnen Titel nach: mal expressiv, mal melancholisch, mal mit Anklängen an die klassische Liedtradition, mal mit Sinn für absurde Spitzen. Larchers Solostücke hat die Pianistin Tamara Stefanovich klanglich und dynamisch wunderbar differenziert und einfühlsam aufgenommen. So wird der Albumtitel «What Becomes» im besten Sinne nachvollziehbar.
Hier ringt ein Pianist und Komponist kreativ und abseits ästhetischer Dogmen mit seinem Instrument: Mag es ihn einst emotional abgestoßen haben, nun kehrt er desto zwingender zurück, allein und gemeinsam mit anderen Musikern.
The Independent Radar, June 2014
Thomas Larcher’s desire to elicit new sounds from the piano, to turn it into «a different instrument», is reflected most here in the prepared-piano piece «Smart Dust», in which the rubberwedges and gaffer-tape applied to the strings enable startling juxtaposi tions of quiet tones with kinetic, percussive flourishes. Elsewhere, the un-prepared approach to the suites «Poems» – subtitled «12 pieces for pianists and other children»! – and «What Becomes» reveal a contemplative sensibility. Performed by Tamara Stefanovich, the latter cycle’s calm rumina tions evoke Chopin, Satie and Feldman. Rounding off the·album is «A Padmore Cycle», in which Larcher accompanies Mark Padmore’s precise but poignant delivery of pithy texts about the composer’s native landscape.
Christopher Dingle: BBC Music, June 2014
Thomas Larcher’s music is notablc for its eclectic frame of reference and a capacity for creating striking and surprising moments. Its frenetic juxtapositions of disparate aesthetics has not always made for an entirely satisfying whole, though the stylistic diversity in «Poems», an often playful sort of pieces ‘for pianists & other children’ featured on this album, feels entirely approrpiate.
The first of «Smart Dust’s» two contrasting movements, making beautiful use of prepared piano, suggests Cage at his most poetic. Esewhere there are resonances of Pärt, Lachenmann, Kurtág, Schubert, Musorgsky, Ligeti, Crumb and Rachmaninov, which may trouble the more stylistically doctrinaire, or those uncomfurtable with tonal clarity. Yet the piano cycle «What Becomes» has a coherence that transcends its surface diversity. Tamara Stevanvitch proves a compelling and sensitive advocate.
As is Mark Padmorc, who is joined at the piano by the composer for «A Padmore Cyde». Setting brief poems by Hans Aschenwald and Alois Hotschnig, reflecting Larcher’s native Tyrolean region, the songs make full use of Padmore’s exceptional interpretative talents. His initial outburst belies the prevailing fragility of a transfixing cycle.